posted on January 4, 2006 07:53:15 AM new
When someone puts in for Child Support, the proper thing to do is to find out who the father is and see why he is not providing support. The following are all (alleged) replies that Dallas women have written on Child Support Agency forms in the section for listing father's details. Or putting it another way...Who's yo Daddy! These are genuine excerpts from the forms.
Be sure to check out # 11 - it takes the prize and # 3 is runner up.
1. Regarding the identity of the father of my twins, child A was fathered by Jim Munson. I am unsure as to the identity of the father of child B, but I believe that he was conceived on the same night.
2. I am unsure as to the identity of the father of my child as I was being sick out of a window when taken unexpectedly from behind. I can provide you with a list of names of men that I think were at the party if this helps.
3. I do not know the name of the father of my little girl. She was conceived at a party at 3600 Grand Avenue where I had unprotected sex with a man I met that night I do remember that the sex was so good that I fainted. If you do manage to track down the father, can you send me his phone number? Thanks.
4. I don't know the identity of the father of my daughter. He drives a BMW that now has a hole made by my stiletto heels in one of the door panels. Perhaps you can contact BMW service stations in this area and see if he's had it replaced.
5. I have never had sex with a man. I am still a Virginian. I am awaiting a letter from the Pope confirming that my son's conception was immaculate and that he is Christ risen again.
6. I cannot tell you the name of child A's dad as he informs me that to do so would blow his cover and that would have cataclysmic implications for the economy. I am torn between doing right by you and right by the country. Please advise.
7. I do not know who the father of my child was as all blacks look the same to me.
8. Peter Smith is the father of child A. If you do catch up with him, can you ask him what he did with my AC/DC CDs? Child B who was also borned at the same time .... well I don't have a clue.
9. From the dates it seems that my daughter was conceived at Disney World; maybe it really is the Magic Kingdom.
10. So much about that night is a blur. The only thing that I remember for sure is Delia Smith did a program about eggs earlier in the evening. If I'd have stayed in and watched more TV rather than going to the party at 146 Miller Drive, mine might have remained unfertilized.
..... and for my personal favorite ......
11. I am unsure as to the identity of the father of my baby, after all when you eat a can of beans you can't be sure which one made you fart.
Yep, you guessed it right. You are all paying taxes to support these dim bulbs.
"“More Iraqis think things are going well in Iraq than Americans do. I guess they don’t get the New York Times over there.”—Jay Leno".
posted on January 4, 2006 08:06:00 AM new
someone once told me of a black woman who has twins,one black and one white and they traced it down to a pool party .
/ lets all stop whining !! /
posted on January 4, 2006 10:23:55 AM new
Bear, I wonder if your goal is simply to make fun of these poor people or do you have a proposed solution? The usual position of the right is against abortion and against birth control education and availability.
You fight tooth and nail to have these unwanted children born, even thought they are unwanted to a single mother who cannot afford to take care of them. You do not want to fund their education, housing or food.
Regardless of what caused their conception or who may be their daddy or their momma, when they are born, unwanted and in poverty would you want your tax money to educate and feed them or would you prefer that they starve and live in poverty...perpetuating the same ignorance that brought them into this world?
posted on January 4, 2006 11:24:51 AM new
::HUGE eyeroll::
[to helen's statements]
They may or may not be poor but they sure are very STUPID and extremely PROMISCuOUS women - used to be called 'sluts', 'easy women'.
Now they're just so poor and we're expected to pay to raise their children by the 'bleeding heart liberals' who NEVER EVER speak to their stupid actions.
posted on January 4, 2006 11:28:10 AM new
And I'd like to address ANOTHER of the statements you make, helen, which as most are - are so far off what the reality of the situation is - as to be sad.
The usual position of the right is against abortion and against birth control education and availability.
Just not true. A false and extremely biased statement.
posted on January 4, 2006 12:38:09 PM new
ROFL
Nice one Bear. But sadly it was true.
What makes you think these women don't just want a free ride from welfare helen? Abortion is legal and available, but it seems they chose not to and if that is the case their little bastards are not my problem.
Ron
"Better to be hated for who you are than loved for who you are not."
posted on January 4, 2006 12:59:56 PM new
Hellen poison pens:
"Bear, I wonder if your goal is simply to make fun of these poor people or do you have a proposed solution? The usual position of the right is against abortion and against birth control education and availability.
You fight tooth and nail to have these unwanted children born, even thought they are unwanted to a single mother who cannot afford to take care of them. You do not want to fund their education, housing or food.
Regardless of what caused their conception or who may be their daddy or their momma, when they are born, unwanted and in poverty would you want your tax money to educate and feed them or would you prefer that they starve and live in poverty...perpetuating the same ignorance that brought them into this world?"
I won't answer for but but I'd have posted it to show what A-Holes they are.
I'm for abortion and birth control.(I wish many of your liberal parents would have used it..) I's prefer that they starve and live in poverty.
(Of course that should be starve OR live in poverty. That's the price of stupidity.)
Helen, for that nasty two faced, little post , Your back on the A-list.
Amen,
Reverend Colin http://www.reverendcolin.com
posted on January 4, 2006 01:27:49 PM newBear, I wonder if your goal is simply to make fun of these poor people or do you have a proposed solution?
I dont have to make fun of them, THEY did it themselves. All your assumption is doing is to reveal the azz in you. Apparently you dont see the humor it the replies.
I thought the replies to be very funny and NOT about their bank account status.
"“More Iraqis think things are going well in Iraq than Americans do. I guess they don’t get the New York Times over there.”—Jay Leno".
posted on January 4, 2006 01:36:31 PM new
I also found your OP to be a GREAT commentary on the left and their so-called 'moral/value' positions.
Always complaining about others trying to shove things down their throats....yea, like morals and values....but think our society should take care of them 'cradle to grave'.
How about the atheists and non-secularists teaching THEM some morals and values rather than just accepting ANYTHING they do...and then blaming others who don't wish to play for THEIR problems. Other WHO HAVE taken personal responsibility for their decisions/actions.
posted on January 4, 2006 01:53:57 PM new
Bear, I don't believe a word of it.
This is just a tasteless joke, imo, but sadly has a ring of truth to it.
Linda, I'm not sure what you mean by saying you think this post is a GREAT commentary on the left and their so-called 'moral/value' positions. I beg your pardon??
Please don't paint the entire Left with such a wide tar brush.
I think that is totally unfair of you to make such denigrating remarks about an entire segment of our population.
I'd like to believe that we are all free thinkers and form our own moral/values.. I really resent your constant grouping of All Lefties, Liberal Ladies, etc in one big group.. just to inflame, denigrate or belittle...
You have made your anti abortion position perfectly clear and in the thread linked above you said that you don't believe schools should be teaching anything sex related in the classroom.
ed. to correct link.
[ edited by Helenjw on Jan 4, 2006 02:13 PM ]
posted on January 4, 2006 02:05:19 PM new
I'll try and put it another way, maggie.
When I see the liberals, who are ONLY part of the dem party, establishing some sort of program to stop all these unwed women producing children they can't care for...being supported by the dem party...or by the liberals....then I will stop painting most here with such a broad brush.
Until that time...what I've seen here for years is that the liberal posters I'm addressing personally, continue to condone this 'live and let live' life theory....BUT then they gripe and whine that we [some conservatives here] don't support all the 'liberal' programs to take care of these losers.
No...we're to blame for wanting people to take personal responsibility for their OWN actions.
posted on January 4, 2006 02:14:11 PM new
LOL...helen....so you won't address what I pose to you...but think I'm going to defend my positions again.
I think most long term readers here have seen me state what I would do if I were in control....vs what I'd do with the current situation on both the abortion issue [a compromise vs my own personal beliefs] the same way they will on those of you who continue to support THE TOTAL LACK of those who are promiscuous in the GAY community and those who have no morals/values in the general community.
Gosh...which of 10 men could be the father of my child? You have refused to deal or answer to THEIR behavior and make the ones who do help them....the evil ones.
ONE thread out of probably hundreds I've posted in does NOT give new posters a view into my positions. ONLY shows them you inablity to take all of what I've said into consideration and not present it ONLY one way.
But it's typical of your recent posting habits helen.....not addressing the issues put to you....but singling ME out for your needed attention.
sick helen...and extremely biased....but I expect nothing different from you.
And some here wonder why I paint with such a broad brush, as they tooo do?
Linda, I have in fact, addressed the issue. You on the other hand have not. Calling the poor ignorant mothers represented here by Bear "evil ones" is not addressing the issue. Ron's chosen designation for the babies as "little bastards" is not addressing the issue. I simply asked, what do you propose to do about the problem other than laugh about it?
If you can't discuss anything sanely, forget the "issue".
posted on January 4, 2006 02:30:34 PM new
Linda, I'm sorry, maybe it's me, but I'm not following or understanding you.
Okay, lets address what you said here:
Linda:When I see the liberals, who are ONLY part of the dem party, establishing some sort of program to stop all these unwed women producing children they can't care for...being supported by the dem party...or by the liberals....then I will stop painting most here with such a broad brush.
Am I understanding you are saying unless anyone who is a Liberal establishes a program to stop unwed women from producing,or at least speak out against it, you will continue to judge all liberals as immoral with poor values? That just doesn't make any sense.
I for one don't cheer unwed mothers on to produce more children, I don't condone having babies as a means of attaining welfare. I am for welfare reform. Golly, and I thought I was liberal.. I guess Mingo was correct when she said I must be a NeoCon then..just didn't know it.. LOL
posted on January 4, 2006 02:37:24 PM new
First off hellen, I have never called their children NOR them the 'evil' ones.
Again that's ALL in your own head....which appears to me to be running in many liberal ladies heads today.
----------------
I have addressed how the Republican party helps them. I have pointed out this President's actions to eliminate this poverty CREATED by the women you refuse to admit are the ones causing this problem, THEMSELVES.
I'm saying it's you liberals who won't address a program that does ANYTHING to put a stop to it. All I see you liberals doing is supporting MORE government care/gov. aid for those who make STUPID personal decisions.
You want to blame the republican's/conservatives but I've NEVER seen you mention leftie Chruch groups that help unwed mothers/their children. I've seen just the opposite....you and your liberal lady supporters don't want religious groups trying to discourage abortions....don't want to give credit where credit is due...the religious groups that do help unwed mothers.
Nope....like most things the liberals whine and complain, point negative fingers all the time, but don't do a damn thing about any of the problems. Nothing to stop them - just the usual cradle to grave nannyship/gov. take care of every stupid person in this country. NEVER EVER expect or work towards their OWN lack of personal responsibility.....nope just blame the right for not just talking...but actually taking action to MAKE them self-suffient/self responsible.
Like clinton did when HE signed the welfare bill to cut programs and MAKE them get jobs.
posted on January 4, 2006 02:55:05 PM new
maggie - Am I understanding you are saying unless anyone who is a Liberal establishes a program to stop unwed women from producing,or at least speak out against it, you will continue to judge all liberals as immoral with poor values? That just doesn't make any sense.
No, not quite, maggie. I know there are many dems who don't support the liberal nonsense on many subjects, this being one of them.
I'm saying however that I have not seen 'liberals' set in place [say, in THIER schools] a program to discourage this continuation of our moral decline.
BUT when the right does just that....they get hammered about all this religious crap. When it's NOT JUST religious people who would like to see our Nations moral values be back where they were before this 'live and let live' theory of the liberals started having so much influence.
Like for one example....the unwed mother issue. They want all those nitwits to be taken care of....but I haven't seen them taking a position that say after so many children they should be permanently fixed - or limits of SOME sort set on them. Them being forced to work...not live off gov. aid. No, we're to financially support them, feel so sorry for them.
I don't. They made their bed...they lived their lives the way they want...fine....just don't ask ME to pay for the stupid decision THEY made. Let them.
I've not seen helen ONCE mention/address their total lack of morals....but she slams those of us who would like to see this change come about. Like to see more be held responsible for their own actions.
I for one don't cheer unwed mothers on to produce more children, I don't condone having babies as a means of attaining welfare. I am for welfare reform.
As are many dems...as many dems feel/think/believe....NOT helen though.
Golly, and I thought I was liberal..I guess Mingo was correct when she said I must be a NeoCon then..just didn't know it..LOL
I never personally saw fenix's posts as her being a liberal either. A dem yes, until she, herself called herself a liberal. I've never called bunni a liberal, saw her as a left-leaning Independent who DOES have the ability to not accept the 'liberal' positions hook, line and sinker as does helen.
I've always seen KD and kaira's and mingotree as extreme liberals....very far left....from what they've posted.
helen, imo, is further left than liberalism at least a socialist if not further left. cheryl sometimes, many times comes across to me as a progressive/socialist supporter, which she has admitted to being, imo...by helping to run the campaign of one.
Of course, this is just MY personal take on them. But what I'm trying to say is when I say all the liberal women here....it doesn't mean all the women posters.
And you've not gotten into much of the political discussions to allow others to make a judgement of their own on where you stand, yourself.
posted on January 4, 2006 03:07:03 PM newI've always seen KD and kaira's and mingotree as extreme liberals....very far left....from what they've posted.
Very far left? You couldn't be more wrong about me, lindak. You have no idea!
And ONLY because I don't support the Bush administration's actions on Iraq and his abstinence-only thoughts for sex-ed.
Most of the labels you've put on me and all the other things you've claimed I've said here is nonsense you've pulled out of the air because of your extreme dislike for me.
posted on January 4, 2006 03:45:57 PM new
[i]I'm saying however that I have not seen 'liberals' set in place [say, in THIER schools] a program to discourage this continuation of our moral decline.[i/]
I didn't know liberals had THIER(sic) own schools, but assuming they do for the sake of argument, what exactly would they do to discourage this continuation of our moral decline? Really. I'd like to know.
____________________________________________
Habla siempre que debas y calla siempre que puedas....
posted on January 4, 2006 04:02:16 PM new
Private and Christian schools pretty much get to set their own standards or rules with the exception of adhearing to laws of the state and federal govt -- do they not? In that sense, public schools are easily considered more liberal.
Get real.
